24
more poignant"; (1) Laurence Stallings - "As anbringing of
one girl’s thoughts, as an approach to death with the last falling
recollection of one suspended over the abyss of death, Fraulein
ölse is literature of the first water", (2) and Rose Lee who
head her review with the words "Bisarre, eloudy brilliance of
Schnitzler" and continuen, "His Frauleinird resembles an opal
There is one corsion of the same story in Oscar
The story adheres perfectly to the three drama¬
flawlessly out.
tic unities - the action laste four hours.” (3) J. W. Krulch
Wilde's Salomé
was the only one who was absolutely opposed to the story and
even he was forced to concede that it was skillfully told. among
his other oomments were: - "Schnitzler's somewhat lurid novelette
is in nood a littleikloser to the sentimental scabrousness of
'True Etories' than is le'grateful to my taste. It's rather taarful
picture seems to me quite unconvincing and itsieborate paycho-
logy false. Undoubtedly there is still in the telling and every
procaution is taken to keguise the banality of the incident, but
it remains, however dressed or undressed, a silly story."
Once again when an adverse criticism was given the redewer could
not honestly withhold a kind word - "We may be wrong, but we be-
lieve very strongly the success of Mr. Schnitzler - and in part
he is very successful - does not overcome the natural distaste
for his trite and unnecessarily gross fable." (5) frequently one
sentence suffices to give the jist of the resction to the book:
"An old them in a new setting, but exquisitely done from all
points" (6) and "Fraulein3lse 1s at once an extremly difficult
technical tour do force and an exciting, often moving story." (7)
The same delicacies which P. loving had pointed out in his review
of the German book - "the skill and address which are both engaging
and remerkable, and the rhythm of the monologue which is quite be-
yond reproof" (8) - are again pointed out in the reviews of the
contre la nouvelle de la guerre
Tiew of Literature. Nov. 28, 1025, II, 335.
Saturday
Nov. I. gls. pöm.
aa, Sept. 6,1925, p 12. (steok Review Section).
Nov. 18,1925, CXXI,öeö.
Ant. Nov. 21, 1925, p 8
(Oosten), Nov. 28, 1925.
„ Nov. 11, 25, xLIV, 812.
ng Post Literary Reviev, May 9,1925.
more poignant"; (1) Laurence Stallings - "As anbringing of
one girl’s thoughts, as an approach to death with the last falling
recollection of one suspended over the abyss of death, Fraulein
ölse is literature of the first water", (2) and Rose Lee who
head her review with the words "Bisarre, eloudy brilliance of
Schnitzler" and continuen, "His Frauleinird resembles an opal
There is one corsion of the same story in Oscar
The story adheres perfectly to the three drama¬
flawlessly out.
tic unities - the action laste four hours.” (3) J. W. Krulch
Wilde's Salomé
was the only one who was absolutely opposed to the story and
even he was forced to concede that it was skillfully told. among
his other oomments were: - "Schnitzler's somewhat lurid novelette
is in nood a littleikloser to the sentimental scabrousness of
'True Etories' than is le'grateful to my taste. It's rather taarful
picture seems to me quite unconvincing and itsieborate paycho-
logy false. Undoubtedly there is still in the telling and every
procaution is taken to keguise the banality of the incident, but
it remains, however dressed or undressed, a silly story."
Once again when an adverse criticism was given the redewer could
not honestly withhold a kind word - "We may be wrong, but we be-
lieve very strongly the success of Mr. Schnitzler - and in part
he is very successful - does not overcome the natural distaste
for his trite and unnecessarily gross fable." (5) frequently one
sentence suffices to give the jist of the resction to the book:
"An old them in a new setting, but exquisitely done from all
points" (6) and "Fraulein3lse 1s at once an extremly difficult
technical tour do force and an exciting, often moving story." (7)
The same delicacies which P. loving had pointed out in his review
of the German book - "the skill and address which are both engaging
and remerkable, and the rhythm of the monologue which is quite be-
yond reproof" (8) - are again pointed out in the reviews of the
contre la nouvelle de la guerre
Tiew of Literature. Nov. 28, 1025, II, 335.
Saturday
Nov. I. gls. pöm.
aa, Sept. 6,1925, p 12. (steok Review Section).
Nov. 18,1925, CXXI,öeö.
Ant. Nov. 21, 1925, p 8
(Oosten), Nov. 28, 1925.
„ Nov. 11, 25, xLIV, 812.
ng Post Literary Reviev, May 9,1925.